Thursday, March 21, 2019
Good Use - How to Use the Language Properly :: Teaching Writing Education Essays
Good Use - How to Use the Language mighty What is smashing use? It hindquarters be a number of things for diverse people. The English professor has a entirely different definition of good enough use than the mathematician or the businessman. The problem arises how does the ordinary person come what is good use and what is not. What is the meaning of good use, the noun and verb agreeing or is it something much than that? One can read excerpts from old authors on their thoughts and beliefs, but do these thoughts and beliefs withstand the examen of time. I would like to touch on a few of these authors and consider my own thoughts.I would like to start the trek through bill with John F. Genung. Genung thought that good use had a standard which both writer should follow. The standard is only sensation word. The word is PURITY. As Genung states the writer mustiness see to it he keeps the mother tongue unsullied. The use of one word to describe good writing is crazy. It takes m ore than just PURITY to surrender good writing, sure it may help, but there has to be more to it than just that one thing. My reasoning for this is there would not be rafts of textbooks if good use were that simple. I know in grade prepare or even high school, students are taught how to use the manner of speaking correctly. If entirely it took to have good writing was purity in our writing, then how would we know if it was good usage or not. Genung expressed that the mother tongue must be kept unsullied, that can not happen with new rowing being added to the language. New word of thought of and use in our language all the time, and they are used in good writing. This is the point that I disagree with Genung. The word unsullied in his article is rarely used in society today, does he have bad usage because it is no longer pure to the mother tongue? I dont think so.I read the article Justins links to the underground it was written by a man who works at MIT. To be honest, I really dont mean what the article was about. This is for good reason, the article was cleverly crafted. There was no capitalization in the article, the lower case i had me, all I treasured to do is go and correct his paper because it was very irritating to me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment