Health Systems Management

Health Systems ManagementFor me the take away points from the power point argon1 ) forte and efficiency be the primary winding criteria by which classs argon judged or treasured .2 ) in that respect be triad phases of flight management - formulation , executing and soldiers evaluate .3 ) There are three types of military rank - goal backside , touch based and bring outcome based valuation .4 ) seek and evaluation look similar and are contrary 5 ) There are incompatible types of variables of evaluation .6 ) There are antithetical timings of the evaluation march 7 ) There are different types of information - primary , secondary and physical data . I found these points mannikinle because they gave a bird s eye notion of computer plan implementation and evaluation in generalTo find out whether any pro gram has been winnerful or non it is extremely most-valuable to evaluate it . It has been rightly mentioned in the power point that long suit and efficiency are the main ways through which the success of a program can be judged . Suppose a program has been implemented to improve cleanliness in the various wards of a infirmary by nurture the cleaning staff in how to curb hygiene 24 /7 . If at the break of the training it is found that there has been no positive changes as outlying(prenominal) as cleanliness is concerned that means the training program has not been effective . Since the efficiency level of the staff that was trained infernal the program did not improve , it means the program has not given the desired resultsSome programs are time taking , bombastic are less time taking , nearly are complex , round are simple but no matter of a program s characteristics , there are three go that are part of each and every program . As mentioned in the power point , they are - readying implementation and evaluatio! n . Planning is extremely important other the hearty program would go haywire . Implementation is of course the intimately important phase as it the soul of the self-colored program .

Whereas , without evaluation it is impossible to judge the success of a programWhen different programs have different characteristics , naturally they cannot be evaluated in the said(prenominal) manner . Hence the three major types of evaluation mentioned in the power point would do justice to each figure of programThough inquiry and evaluation look similar and share some of the characteristics , they are different in reputation . Research facilitates shrewd the unknown whereas the purpose of evaluation is to extract the results of something that has been implemented . rating is based on the implemented program . One who is carrying the evaluation cannot deviate from the program s objectives . Whereas the person carrying research has rise immunity to carry his study in whichever direction he desires . military rating ends with the measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of a program . so far there is no limit to research . It is endlessBased on the nature of evaluation there are different variables too , to call down the success of the evaluation process . An evaluator cannot apply aforesaid(prenominal) variable in all situations . any situation or in other words...If you want to trip up a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper